Electronic junk!

The bunch of electronic junk, so typical for our times, which Pat Bray dropped by with, was obviously suitable for art making. I thought I would use the many flat surfaces in different shades of clear, grey and black to build a kind of faux Mondrian, using the slim aluminium edges as separators between the fields, and enthusiastically went to work, but then I quickly discovered something much more exciting. It turns out that a laptop screen is composed of several layers of thin plastic sheets, all performing their own functions, that sandwiched together becomes a unity. Taken apart, particularly two sheets interested me. They were some kind of polarizing filters, probably there either to direct all the light forwards or to reduce light glares from the sides. Held tightly together over the screen they only had that effect, but when you picked the screen apart and put space between the filters, they started creating very interesting visual phenomena. Suddenly, when looking at an object through the screen from a distance, the image would break up in different colours, producing strange and almost nauseating three-dimensional spectres hanging and warping in mid air. I guess the filters acted on the light a bit like a rainbow, diffracting it in it’s wavelengths, creating several overlapping images gradually blurring together.

Screen turned cube.

To enhance this effect and make it visible and available, I constructed a box frame with four sides but without a lid, where I mounted the plastic sheets recovered from the laptop screen. This way, one could lower one’s hand, or an object, into the “five-dimensional” frame and see it dissolve and spread depending on how it was moved around. Or one could place the frame around a sculpture or vase of flowers, turning a simple decorative embellishment into a surreal colour spectacle that morphed as one watched it from different angles. Without anything in it though, the frame looked rather bland, so that it needed to be activated to function, and at best by moving something around within it. Should be easy to try at home if you have an old laptop or other flat screen you are going to trash anyway.

Innocuous at a distant.

Object no. 32

Already a highly aesthetic and suggestive object.

Castle Ceetch is one of my favourites from the ESW edition of the Repair Shop, not just because of the final sculpture but also because of how well it was made. The small and delicate ceramic salter Ms Glover brought in was already very suggestive in itself. It was clearly hand made and had been given an almost organic shape by its maker, but the broken off top, with its uneven jagged edges, to me at least, turned it into a ruined tower on the top of a lonely hill, overlooking a dark, brooding forest. A very romantic object. But it also held several other associations, to tourist trinkets, handicraft, beloved kitsch and memories of travels and places. I wanted to turn the salter into this romantic kitschy tower, but without changing it in any way, as it was almost perfect as it was. The solution was to create a setting, or a pedestal, that would suggest just those associations to other people to.

You can almost hear the squeaking of the bats living in the tower.

When I say I particularly liked the way this piece was made, I really mean that the collaboration with the assistant worked well, because the shaping of the clay was all up to Cecily Hughes, one of the ECA students who helped me for a few days each. Any time you delegate part of your work, what you hope for is that those helping you understand and share your vision, not that they follow a set of precise technical instructions. In this specific case I saw immediately that Cecily “got” what I wanted to happen, both on the level of cultural meanings and associations, and as a language of forms and shapes. That she wasn’t an expert with ceramics was then absolutely no problem, since the image we had in our head, the sculpture we were working towards, was the same.

You could still keep crushed pepper and salt in the courtyards.

The instructions I was giving Cecily while she was working then, could be aimed at helping with craft knowledge and design tips, but that would lead to the result we both already agreed upon. Because of this, I could leave her mostly to it, after an initial discussion, and then a short more technical briefing once she got her hands into it and hit the first obstacles. I think this way of working is the most satisfying for both artist and assistant, apart from also leading to the best results. The artist (or in other jobs, the manager) doesn’t want to spend time micro-managing details, at least that’s the way it should be, and the assistant surely doesn’t want someone looking over their shoulder all the time, but rather someone who encourages and supports when needed. Successful micro-managing is impossible anyway, since there is no technical language so precise that it can exactly describe and define what you want to someone who doesn’t share your vision. You can try but you will only get frustrated. Also, it assumes that you always knows best, wish is hogwash of course. Even if you might have more experience and skills in a specific technical area, if it is not your own hands doing the job, your task is to give the one actually doing the job the instructions and tips that they need to fulfil the task.

The small details is what makes it in the end.

Object no. 39

Used to be 3D, now 0D.

Liulu Ehrlichman was one of a group of art students who came in to see the Repair Shop, all of them bringing with them something they had themselves tried to turn into an artwork but given up on. The laconic description she wrote on the receipt says it all, -I broke the lenses out off them. Indeed she did. But then she stopped there. I guess one of the things I really learned at art college myself, was making informed judgements on what art worked and what didn’t. This new heightened awareness can sometimes become a hindrance though. If you think too much about the how and if the art works, you might not even get the ideas in the first place. At least that is my experience. So I decided to turn the glasses into an aid in that process.

Also a cool fashion statement when going to openings.

It’s not that I think seeing the world through a plus and a minus changes your vision in any way (other then limiting your peripheral vision a bit), but the knowledge that you are doing this, and that other people are looking at your glasses and interpreting them as such, can serve as a reminder that judgments are based on nothing more than collectively agreed upon cultural conventions. And that successful art often rely upon self aware manipulation of those norms.

Object no. 65

Nice old oak, but getting a bit loose in the joints.

Apart from this old, rickety chair, the two sistersRobin and Rowan also came in with a broken lamp stand and a table leg, that their parents had allowed them to take to the Repair Shop. They were so spirited and enthusiastic that I definitely wanted to give them something fun and useful back. I had just made the banjo (no 2) and started on Ocarina (no 23) so I was into instruments, and thought that the nicely turned lamp stand would make a nice wooden flute or horn if combined with the similarly turned oaken table leg, but alas, my skills as an instrument maker are pretty limited. I managed to put them together into something vaguely believable, but not a sound came out of them. Luckily for me the sisters had been provident enough to bring not just one, or two objects, but three, which gave me a final shot at surprising them. The chair blocked up a bit in my head for a while, as I couldn’t get a good (and useful, for two little girls) idea out of it, until I remembered that we would soon have Christmas.

Would probably need some extra runners to get up a bit more from the ground.

The shape was really there all along, inside the chair, just waiting for me to make the connection, then turning it inside out so to speak was easy enough. I don’t know how well it runs though. Maybe it turns out as hopeless in a snowy slope as my flute was as an instrument. That is one of the dangers of making sculptures that are expected to do anything more than just being looked at.

Perfectly bent wooden runners.

The problem that I can foresee with this sled design is that the mid-croos-beam, where the back used to be attached to the seat, will scrape against the ground in thick snow and impede speed (which on the other hand might be a good thing from a health and safety point of view). The obvious solution would be to glue two new bits of hardwood, scored on the top to allow for bending, under the runners to lift the whole sled an inch or so off the ground. Wish I had the time to do it then, but I finished this sculpture on the very last day, and didn’t find any suitable wood lying around.

And a disclaimer is never out of place.

Object no. 37

Ethnic handicraft from some exotic destination.

Working so fast and intuitively as I do in the Temporary Art Repair Shop, things often turn up that are psychologically and aesthetically interesting, but maybe not so suitable. Caroline Wilson came in with a small wooden box, one of these ethnic-craft things made of really nice hard-wood but with second rate fittings and detailing. I guess it was intended as a key box or something, but ms Wilson had wanted to give it to her very young daughter to play with. It’s just that the small round glass in the front was broken, which made it dangerous for children’s hands, and she also found it a bit dull. My response was to leap directly from the idea of changing the sharp broken glass into something the opposite, and also that small kids would recognize. I removed the glass, sanded the edges soft, and also stuffed the box with parts of a teddy bear. I figured it would make sense in a tactile way for a kid who hadn’t really started speaking yet.

Turned out to be a very strange object.

Then one of my assistants saw it and asked, -Isn’t that a bit Freudian? And of course she was right. Very Freudian indeed. But the thing about Freudian slips (if I may call it that) is that they are unconscious, they happen because for some funky reason your perform highly significant associations and mind-jumps without even noticing it. That’s part of the beauty with this spontaneous and fast way of making art, that you discover connections and meanings you wouldn’t get at if you sat down and thought for a long time, rather than just pursuing the first idea that popped into your head. The problem though, was that this box was meant for a wee girl, which made me very concerned with what the parents would think. Oh gosh…

You can hide your “keys” between the legs of the teddy.

So we tried to take the object away from that simple Freudian interpretation. We made the opening look like the gate of a house and added house-like decorations. But that didn’t help either. The soft house, or the house that is hard on the outside but soft once you get through the gate, is if anything even more Freudian. Blasted. Once you’we started down a Freudian slip there is only one way to slide, further and further into it. So there was nothing to do but admit failure. The object was quite successful anyway, just not suitable for kids, so I simply admitted defeat and explained the thing to ms Wilson, suggesting that the Soft House end up somewhere else than in the children’s room, in the grown-ups bedroom perhaps? Where Freudian slips are not only allowed but sometimes even wanted.

When working in the UK it is always good to stick on a disclaimer.

Object no. 45